Hey, give credit where credit is due! CNN did the best debate by far in Florida. No one comes close to being a combination of tough questions and fair amount of time for our "lonesome" candidate, Paul.:an_clap:
I loved the way Wolf hard-nosed the "chosen-one!" Newt couldn't bluff his way out this time.:laugh: In fact, Newt looked as if he was the one with egg on his face this time. Probably a rotten egg, too?

And the results: Paul was great, and had plenty of time to deliver his complete political messages, after seemly being gagged to death on most of the previous debates.
If Ron Paul had been given this much time for debating previously, he might be leading the polls?:+clueless

Hey, you can't fool these Californians! Check the remarks about the debate from the Bear state.:grrr:

...

Come on intelligent forum debaters. This is down to a two-horse race, no doubt about it.
You have to choose Romney or Paul!

Gingrich looks like a cheap cardboard character. That's his own, lying, earned, pitfall.

Santorium is too bluntly shallow, especially with his thoughts of aggression towards Iran.

Romney looks and talks like a "spoon mouthed-fed" man since childbirth. Is he tough enough? Good question, plus, he comes across as an insensitive individual to the downtrodden citizens of America. He just cannot relate to them, can he?

Paul, the tough ol' proven warrior, who always spits out the truth, even if it cuts...

I bet this is what pimike was warning us about when his thread stated "the world will end in 2011?" Iran will get a nuclear weapon and use it this year against the USA and we''ll respond with 10, 000 nuclear warheads! That will be THE FINAL COUNTDOWN FOR THE WORLD! :yikes: :an_violin Announcing the End Of The World!:an_speak::turndevil:an_laugh: "Bigdaddy" trying to run! :an_beatup :lmao::lmao::lmao:

Discussion: [URL="http://forum.sbrforum.com/politics-amp-economics/1355203-video-ron-paul-enters-den-vipers-interview-foxnews-allstars.html"]A Response To VIDEO: Ron Paul Enters A Den Of Vipers, Interview With FoxNews AllStars![/URL]

:an_dance: :+cartoon- :an_dance: One guess as to which poster is in the middle?

Wow! I could only catch about 1/3 of the debate online. Of course, the small part I caught was the usual diminishing of, guess who? Yes, our SBR hero, Ron Paul.

I watched the first approximately 40 minutes before Paul could get a word in. And, finally, when he did, he was interrupted several times by the "non-biased" interviewers for going over the allotted time limit. :wacko:

You can find parts of this "debate" [:icon_roll] on youtube.com
There was a fairly heated exchange between Paul and Cain. Watch and see if you can determine who is right on this well defended accusation, inserted by Paul? :+clueless

God, so much ass-kissing among the interviewers [again!] and those chosen favorites. Might as well been a solo interview for Romney. Anyway, that's what I saw in those 45 minutes or so.:+yawning-

As usual though, Huntsman continues to impress me more than those favorite sweeties.

Overboard, and the usual bs for this idiot. But, is it actually him or some cowardly clown hiding behind Stern? Sarah most likely cannot prove this is actually Stern and his bud? If she could, I could see millions of dollars coming her direction in her next political campaign. If men in general like this filth, then so be. But, it does reflect to you as a person. Also, what if it was your mother or sister's name used in this manner?
I hope this is Stern because good citizen's need to know just what kind of character he really is....

Yes, it's that time again!
All you have to do is mention Sarah Palin and from behind the woodpile come the SBR rednecks:thumbsdow
What type of boys, or men, are you?
Sarah is a high ranking, clean imaged, American political figure. So what's the "legitimate" beef?

You people remind me of the Nazis of World War 2 Germany. For some illogical reason they hated the Jews. Ever wonder why that depth of evil was so deep-rooted?

I know the answer! The haters were raised by parents that instilled into their brains at a young age that they were superior to any other race, or, any...

That's a good one Branch! Taking advantage of a Bookie with any 5 or 10 cent move! :lmao: No B-lover, I want a line to be moved only when truly necessary. Any fool knows that they overdo all those odds changes by 20 fold. Guys like you are the reason they get by with it.:yes: If sports gamblers would stick together and DEMAND no changes after one change for at least 2 minutes, we all could relax not have to live on pins and needles trying beat the next "dumb" change. Actually, that's a good deal for these, evidently, nervous Books, too? To believe those changes mean something "every" time [ or dime ], is a sign of a rookie's opinion. Just hold the MKR for while, you nervous chickens! :p

Okay, seems this particular page on SBR, everyone is satisified with their Books and how they handle your money, well, investment money? Or, is it you don't know what to do about it, or, just don't care?

I wish some expertize gambler [not those Bookie lovers] would at least make an attempt and explain why our modern computer Books have to change their tough lines like a baby with diarrhea?

Okay, we have Air Force at Navy. Must be a hotty of a game, huh? That line has changed so many times i can hardly set in my seat without falling out....[/not those Bookie lovers]